Mendoza

Mendoza v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20231:20-cv-01133California4,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIKA MENDOZA, et al., an individual, No. 1:20-cv-1133-TLN-CKD on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. MIDEA MICROWAVE AND

ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES

MANUFACTURING CO. LTD, et al., Defendants. 18 This matter1 is before the Court on Defendant Midea Microwave and Electrical Appliances Manufacturing Co., Ltd.’s (“Midea China”) Motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 199.) Plaintiffs Erika Mendoza and James Hunt (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 212.) Midea China filed a reply. (ECF No. 222.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Midea China’s motion.

The Court acknowledges the delay in the issuance of this Order. The overwhelming caseload in the Eastern District of California has been well publicized. On September 13, 2023, 26 Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller reassigned this action to the undersigned following the appointment of Judge Ana de Alba to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.