(PC) Cramer v. Director of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20231:23-cv-01511California1,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01511 JLT CDB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, et al., (Doc. 7) Defendants.

16 Matthew B. Cramer seeks proceed in forma pauperis in this action, asserting the defendants are liable for violations of his civil rights. (Docs. 1, 2.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff is subject to the three-strikes bar of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), identifying the following cases that were dismissed for failure to state a claim:

1. Cramer v. Warner, No. 2:00-mc-00099-FCD-GGH (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed on July 26, 2001); 23 2. Cramer v. Multnomah Cty. Sheriff Dep’t, No. 3:02-cv-00141-JE (D. Or.) (dismissed on June 25, 2002); and

3. Cramer v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.