(PC)Foster

(PC)Foster v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20231:22-cv-00934California665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKY TYRONE FOSTER, Case No: 1:22-cv-00934-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECUSAL INCORPORATED IN FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT J.BURNES and T. CAMPBELL, (Doc. No. 20-1) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for recusal, (Doc. No. 20-1, “Motion”) incorporated within Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, (Doc. No. 20), filed on September 5, 2023. The undersigned previously denied Plaintiff’s motion for recusal filed earlier on July 27, 2023. (Doc. Nos. 13, 14). Liberally construed, Plaintiff again seeks the recusal of the undersigned. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is denied. Plaintiff’s requests the undersigned recuse herself due to his belief that the undersigned is biased against him. (Doc. No. 20 at 11). Without identifying any factual basis, Plaintiff asserts that the undesigned “appears to harbor racial bias” and suggests she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.