(HC) Stuart v. St. Andre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20232:22-cv-02298California683 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. STUART, No. 2:22-cv-02298-DAD-AC (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

v. RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS,

DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION

ROB ST. ANDRE, Warden, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DECLINING

TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF

Respondent. APPEALABILITY (Doc. Nos. 1, 11, 18) 17 Petitioner Anthony D. Stuart is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 1, 2023, respondent moved to dismiss the pending petition as premature pursuant to the decision in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 27 (1971) because appellate proceedings in state court were ongoing and his judgment of conviction was not yet final. (Doc. No. 11.) On October 2, 2023, the assigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.