(PC)Foster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKY TYRONE FOSTER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00934-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

v. ACTION J.BURNES and T. CAMPBELL, (Doc. No. 20) Defendants. ORDER SUA SPONTE GRANTING

PLAINTIFF EXTENSION OF TIME

16 14-DAY DEADLINE 18 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 20). Also contained within the First Amended Complaint is Plaintiff’s construed second motion for recusal, which the undersigned addressed by separate order. (Doc. No. 23). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the District Court dismiss the First Amended Complaint because it fails to state any cognizable constitutional claim. SCREENING REQUIREMENT A plaintiff who commences an action while in prison is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”),…