Radu

(PC) Nitkin v. Radu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20232:23-cv-01837California699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JOSHUA THOMAS NITKIN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01837-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT: v. (1) THE CLERK OF COURT ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS ACTION;

D. RADU, (2) PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED Defendant. COMPLAINT IF HE WISHES TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE

DENIED

16 ECF No. 14

18 19 On November 27, 2023, I found service appropriate for defendant Radu based on 20 plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against him. ECF No. 11. After summons were issued, ECF 21 No. 12, plaintiff filed a “complaint and request for injunction,” ECF No. 14, wherein he restated 22 his claims against Radu, id. at 5, and requested an injunction requiring defendant to stay at least 23 one thousand feet away from him at all times, id. The request for injunctive relief should be 24 denied. I cannot tell whether this filing is meant as an amended complaint. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.