Cameron

(PC) Taylor v. Cameron

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20232:23-cv-02353California1,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 2:23-cv-02353-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER FINDING THAT

THE COMPLAINT CONTAINS

v. UNRELATED CLAIMS AGAINST

MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS AND

N. CAMERON, et al., CANNOT PROCEED AS ARTICULATED Defendants. ECF No. 1 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND DENYING HIS MOTION

TO SEND EXHIBITS AS UNNECESSARY

18 ECF Nos. 2 & 3 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that he filed a grievance against defendant Cameron and the officer violated his First Amendment rights by issuing a disciplinary violation in retaliation. ECF No. 1 at 3. He also claims that, at the subsequent disciplinary hearing, defendants Benevidez and Abarca violated his procedural due process rights. Id. at 5. These two sets of claims are sufficiently related to proceed in the same suit. Plaintiff also alleges,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.