CDCR

(PC) Ross v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20232:23-cv-01920California1,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALCOLM RAY ROSS, Case No. 2:23-cv-01920-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

v. DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER CDCR, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

CLAIM

16 ECF No. 11

18 19 20 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner at Deuel Vocational Institution, brings this action alleging that three members of the unit medical staff and the Tracy water district violated his rights by allowing him to drink toxic water. ECF No. 11 at 2-4. Having reviewed these claims, I find them non-cognizable and recommend this action be dismissed.

26 27 28 I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.