Pearson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILO WALLACE, No. 2:21-cv-00927 TLN DB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS UNKNOWN, et al., Defendants. 16 A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and petitioner has failed to notify the court of a current address. In addition, on May 22, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss, arguing the petition should be dismissed on multiple grounds. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides, in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the 26 …