Daram

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD RAY BOWCUT, No. 2:21-cv-00736 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court are plaintiff’s motions for the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff has filed four motions requesting the appointment of counsel. (ECF Nos. 43, 44, 49, 50.) In support of his motions, he cites 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1919(d), (e)(1) and argues that counsel should be appointed in the interest of justice. (ECF No. 43 at 1-2.) He further states the appointment of counsel is warranted “[b]ased on ‘Good Cause’ of showing exceptional circumstances demonstrating ‘the interests of justice so require’ the…