(PC)Seymour

(PC)Seymour v. Shirley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20231:22-cv-00938California611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 AARON D. SEYMOUR, Case No. 1:22-cv-00938-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS

FROM PARTIES REGARDING

SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY v. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

H. SHIRLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint and has ordered the case to proceed. (ECF No. 9). Defendants have been served and appeared, and all parties participated in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on December 12, 2023. (ECF No. 47). After discussions with the Court, the case did not settle. (Id.) Before scheduling further proceedings in this case, the Court will require each party to submit a statement regarding the schedule and discovery matters. The statements regarding the schedule and discovery shall be filed within thirty days from the date of service of this order. They should be filed with the Court, titled “SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.