(PC) Murillo v. District Attorney Office
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20232:22-cv-01920California955 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIXTO CRUZ MURILLO, Case No. 2:22-cv-01920-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE
v. ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, ECF No. 27 Defendant.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE
CLAIM
18 ECF No. 30
20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this action under section 1983. I previously recommended that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to timely file an amended complaint. ECF No. 27. Weeks after those recommendations were filed, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. ECF No. 30. Given plaintiff’s pro se status, I will excuse the untimeliness of his amended complaint and will withdraw my previous recommendations. However, I have reviewed the newly filed amended…