Krpin

(PC) Cox v. Krpin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20232:18-cv-02523California4,842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., No. 2:18-cv-02523 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOHN KRPIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 57.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend the motion to amend be denied.1 //// //// //// 25 1 On September 13, 2023, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations, which found that plaintiff’s claims in his proposed amended complaint arose from the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out in his complaint. (ECF No. 64.) Defendant filed objections. (ECF No. 66.) Upon further review of the parties’ filings, the undersigned agrees that plaintiff’s proposed claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.