(PC) Allen v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20232:21-cv-00344California2,257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY LEE ALLEN, JR., No. 2:21-cv-0344 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants exposed him to COVID-19 in violation of his constitutional rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 42) and his fourth amended complaint (ECF No. 40) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that the fourth amended complaint (“FAC”) be dismissed without leave to amend. MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME Plaintiff filed a request for a ninety-day extension of time and notice of change of address dated October 5, 2023. (ECF No. 42.) At the time plaintiff’s motion was submitted there were no pending deadlines in this action. Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.