Harrison
(PC) Budd v. Harrison
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANTE RENEE BUDD, No. 2:23-cv-2313 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J.HARRISSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 15, 2023, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. On December 1, 2023, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The court reviewed plaintiff’s amended complaint and, for the limited purposes of §1915A screening, finds that it states potentially cognizable claim against defendants J. Harrison, S.Martinez, and R. Guillermo. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons stated below, the court finds that the amended complaint does not state cognizable claims under the Fourth or Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiff alleges that the actions and omissions of defendants also violated plaintiff’s rights under the Fourth Amendment. (ECF No. 15 at 11.) However, plaintiff includes no facts 27 …