(HC) Tillis v. People of the State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20232:23-cv-02131California898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KINAGA LAMAR TILLIS, No. 2:23-cv-02131-DAD-CKD (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. AMENDED PETITION FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A COGNIZABLE FEDERAL

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF HABEAS CLAIM

CALIFORNIA,

(Doc. Nos. 1, 4) Respondent.

17 Petitioner Kinaga Lamar Tillis proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 12, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the petition before the court be summarily dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. (Doc. No. 4.) The magistrate judge noted that petitioner’s only claims were that the Sutter County Superior Court erred as a matter of California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.