Warden

(HC) Orosco v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20232:23-cv-00392California1,047 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUSTAVO A. OROSCO, No. 2:23-cv-00392-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, FCI HERLONG, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a former federal inmate proceeding pro se in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned for all further proceedings in this action including the entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). See ECF No. 11. In his habeas application, petitioner requests that the Bureau of Prisons apply First Step Act (“FSA”) time credits to advance his release date by 365 days. ECF No. 1 at 1. If these credits are applied, petitioner indicates that his release date should be May 4, 2023 rather than May 4, 2024. ECF No. 1 at 3. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the § 2241 petition on mootness grounds indicating that petitioner was released from FCI Herlong on August 16, 2023

1 Indeed, it appears to the court that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.