Wilson

Wilson v. Timec Services Co.,.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20232:23-cv-00172California2,329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 MARVONTE WILSON and DOMONIQUE No. 2:23-cv-00172 WBS KJN DANIELS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v.

TIMEC SERVICES COMPANY, INC.;

FERROVIAL SERVICES

INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.; VALERO

REFINING COMPANY-CALIFORNIA; DISA GLOBAL SOLUTIONS; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 21 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiffs Marvonte Wilson and Domonique Daniels brought this putative class action in Solano County Superior Court against Timec Services Company, Inc. (“Timec”); Ferrovial Services Infrastructure, Inc. (“Ferrovial”); Valero Refining Company-California (“Valero”); and DISA Global Solutions (“DISA”). Plaintiffs allege employment discrimination based on race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.