Corpuz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELISSA FAIRFIELD, Case No. 1:19-cv-00632-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT1

ALBERT KHOO and IKWINDER SINGH, (Doc. No. 102) Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Albert Khoo and Ikwinder Singh’s motion for summary judgment filed October 7, 2022. (Doc. No. 102). Plaintiff elected not to file any opposition despite being granted a sixty-day extension of time. (Doc. No. 104). For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion for summary judgment because there is no genuine dispute of material facts as to whether Defendants acted with deliberate indifference to 26 1 All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 108). Thus, the pending Findings and Recommendation (Doc. No. 105) are mooted and addressed by the instant order. 28 Plaintiff’s serious…