O'Neel

O'Neel v. City of Folsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20232:21-cv-02403California707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FAUN O’NEEL, individually and as No. 2:21-cv-2403 WBS DB Guardian Ad Litem for her children B.T., A.O. D.O. and A.T., Plaintiffs, ORDER v. CITY OF FOLSOM, et al., Defendants. 17 On July 25, 2022, the assigned District Judge issued a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. (ECF No. 34.) Pursuant to that order the parties are to direct any request to modify the dates set therein to the undersigned, with the exception of requests to change the date of the trial. (ECF No. 34 at 5.) On December 4, 2023, plaintiff filed an ex-parte application to extend discovery related deadlines by seven days. (ECF No. 68.) On December 6, 2023, defendants County of Sacramento and Sasha Smith filed an opposition. (ECF No. 71.) On December 7, 2023, defendant Keryn Starks filed a joinder of defendants’ opposition. (ECF No. 73.) Plaintiff filed a response that same day. (ECF No. 72.) “Once the district court had filed a pretrial scheduling order pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.