Miller v. First National Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20231:23-cv-01331California464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENISE MILLER, Case No. 1:23-cv-01331-NODJ-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT FIRST

NATIONAL BANK TO SHOW CAUSE

v. WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT

FIRST NATIONAL BANK, et al. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Defendants. (Doc. 13)

THREE (3)-DAY DEADLINE 17 On September 7, 2023, Plaintiff Denise Miller initiated against Defendants First National 19 Bank and Experian Information Solutions Inc. for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and 20 the California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. (Doc. 1). The following day, the 21 Court set an initial scheduling conference. (Doc. 3). On December 5, 2023, the Court reset the 22 scheduling conference to December 18, 2023, as counsel for Defendant First National Bank had 23 not executed the parties’ joint scheduling report. (Doc. 13). On December 18, 2023, the Court held a scheduling conference via Zoom. Garret F. 25 Charity appeared on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.