Williams v. Yuba City

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KYLE WILLIAMS, No. 2:22-cv-01750-JAM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

YUBA CITY, et al., Defendants. 15 Defendants Yuba City, Katheryn Danisan, D. Hauck, Enrique Jurado, Nico Mitchell, and Spencer Koski’s (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiff Kyle Williams’ (“Plaintiff”) first amended complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss Pl.’s FAC (“Mot.”), ECF No. 17. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion.1 I. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Defendants request three matters be judicially noticed under Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Mot. at 7; Defs.’ Req. for Judicial Notice (“RJN”), ECF No. 17-3. “A court 27 1This motion was determined to be suitable for decision…