Kelso

(PC) Puckett v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20231:23-cv-00054California2,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00054-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND

v. (Doc. No. 49) J. BARRIOS, HERNANDEZ, WHITE, and

GUTIERREZ, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Defendants. (Doc. No. 55)

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SCREENING

18 (Doc. No. 56) 19 On June 30, 2023, Defendants in this matter filed an Answer to Plaintiff’s operative First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 37). On October 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed both a Motion to Amend his FAC (Doc. No. 49) and a proposed Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 50, “SAC”). On December 6, 2023, Defendants filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint but requested the Court to screen the SAC. (Doc. No. 56). Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.