Hosey

(PC) Beavers v. Hosey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20231:21-cv-00650California1,020 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY LEE BEAVERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00650-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL

v. (Doc. 16) HOSEY, et al., Defendants. 16 The Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, which concluded that Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint should be permitted to proceed on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment Failure to Protect claims against Defendants Hosey, Espinosa, and Mendoza, but that all remaining claims should be dismissed. (See Doc. 16.) Plaintiff filed objections on November 17, 2023. (Doc. 17). According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. The magistrate judge correctly found that the allegations in the First Amended Complaint do not set forth any claim as to Sgt. John Doe 1 that are cognizable in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.