Cox

(PC) Bailey v. Cox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20231:22-cv-00757California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY BAILEY, No. 1:22-cv-0757 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

T. COX, et al., AMEND Defendants. (Docs. 36, 47, 49) 16 Timothy Bailey seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, and Plaintiff requested leave to amend his complaint after the motion was fully briefed. (Docs. 36, 47.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed “to state a cognizable claim for relief,” and recommended Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted. (Doc. 49 at 12.) In addition, the magistrate judge recommended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.