Sanders

Sanders v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20231:22-cv-00577California5,606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILIP SANDERS, No. 1:22-cv-00577-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. (Doc No. 10) ROBERT HICKS and J. LARA.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

Defendants. DENY MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

16 (Doc. No. 12) 17 14-DAY DEADLINE 18 19 Plaintiff Philip Sanders (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action on May 13, 2022 by filing a civil complaint. (Doc. Nos. 1, 7). Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 10, “FAC”) is currently before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Also pending is Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, which he incorporated in another motion filed on October 5, 2023. (Doc. No. 12). For

1 While Plaintiff’s claims were filed past California’s two-year statute of limitations applicable to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions, because Plaintiff’s claims were subject to statutory tolling from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.