(PC) Salido v. Bureau of Prisons

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20231:23-cv-01395California268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IGNACIO SALIDO, JR., No. 1:23-cv-01395-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. (ECF No. 10) BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On November 8, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claim, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall be ordered to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order, failure to prosecute, and failure to state a cognizable claim. (Id.) Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.