Klenk

Klenk v. City of Etna

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20232:22-cv-01366California4,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYDER KLENK, No. 2:22-cv-01366-DAD-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF

ETNA’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND

CITY OF ETNA, et al., DENYING DEFENDANT MENDES’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 56, 57)

17 This matter came before the court on November 21, 2023 for a hearing on the motions to dismiss filed by defendant City of Etna (“City”) and defendant Nathan Mendes. (Doc. Nos. 56, 57.) Attorneys James Cook and Brandon Yee appeared by video on behalf of plaintiff Ryder Klenk, attorney Derick Konz appeared by video on behalf of the defendant City, and attorney Amanda Moyer appeared by video on behalf of defendant Mendes. (Doc. No. 62.) For the reasons explained below, the defendant City’s motion to dismiss will be granted without further leave to amend and defendant Mendes’s motion to dismiss will be denied. BACKGROUND In his operative third amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.