(PC) Mansour v. North Kern State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20231:22-cv-01054California971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUSTAFFA MANSOUR, Case No. 1:22-cv-01054-JLT-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

v.

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LUKEN, Defendant. 14 Mustafa Mansour is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has reviewed this case and the parties’ scheduling and discovery statements. (ECF Nos. 50, 52). To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,1 the Court will direct that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced.2

21 1 See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 508-09 (9th Cir. 2008) (“We begin with 22 the principle that the district court is charged with effectuating the speedy and orderly administration of justice. There is universal acceptance in the federal courts that, in carrying out this mandate, a district court has the authority to enter pretrial case management…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.