(PS) Seneka v. County of Yolo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20232:23-cv-00124California318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANA SENEKA, No. 2:23-cv-00124 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF YOLO, a government entity;

YOLO COUNTY CHILD WELFARE

SERVICES, a government entity, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 10, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.