Tapiz

(PC) Shannon v. Tapiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20232:22-cv-01504California399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL TYRONE SHANNON, No. 2:22-cv-1504 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

J. TAPIZ, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed May 24, 2023, the second amended complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 5-6. Plaintiff has been afforded multiple extensions of time to amend the complaint and failed to do so. ECF Nos. 15, 17, 19. In granting the most recent request for an extension of time, plaintiff was warned that no further extensions would be granted absent a showing of extraordinary cause. ECF No. 19. The deadline for filing an amended complaint has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.