Kanter-Doud

Kanter-Doud v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20232:23-cv-00678California1,614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JODY KANTER-DOUD, No. 2:23-cv-00678-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., (Doc. No. 6) Defendant.

16 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Sacramento County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 6.) On June 30, 2023, the motion was taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 20.) For the reasons explained below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion to remand. BACKGROUND On January 10, 2023, plaintiff filed this financial abuse case against defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and unnamed Doe defendants 1–25 in the Sacramento County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1-1 at 20.) On February 18, 2023, plaintiff filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) asserting the following two causes of action: (1) financial elder abuse in violation of California Welfare &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.