(PC)Lindsey

(PC)Lindsey v. People of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20231:23-cv-01078California2,267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 REGJUAN DONNELL LINDSEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-01078-NODJ-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING PREVIOUS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF No. 12) AND

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Defendant.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS

17 Regjuan Donnell Lindsey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff generally alleges that correctional officers 19 used excessive force against him when Plaintiff refused to stand. (ECF No. 13 at 3). 20 Now that Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint, the Court vacates its previous 21 Findings and Recommendations, which recommended dismissing the case without prejudice 22 for failing to prosecute, and instead, recommends that the case be dismissed with prejudice for 23 failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 14 days from the date of service of these Findings and 24 Recommendations to file his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.