(PC)Trehearne

(PC)Trehearne v. Amador County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20232:22-cv-00254California384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS TREHEARNE, No. 2:22-cv-00254-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMADOR COUNTY, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former1 county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 25, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff

Review of the Amador County inmate locator website indicates that plaintiff is no longer in custody. The Court may take judicial notice of information stored on Amador County’s inmate 25 locator website. See In re Yahoo Mail Litig., 7 F. Supp. 3d 1016, 1024 (N.D. Cal. 2014) (a court may take judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.