Grubbs

(PC) Hammler v. Grubbs

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20232:23-cv-02770California3,376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 2:23-cv-2770 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEMITRIOUS GRUBBS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.1 23 1 Several courts have found plaintiff to have three strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Hammler v. Dignity Health, 1:20-cv-1778 JLT HBK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2022); Hammler v. California, 1:20-cv-00630 DAD GSA (E.D. Cal. June 4, 2020); Hammler v. Diaz, 1:20-cv-0488 25 JLT (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2020); Hammler v. Compose, 1:19-cv-1149 DAD GSA (E.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2019). As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.