Humphey

(PC) Cunningham v. Humphey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20231:23-cv-00564California204 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 L. C. CUNNINGHAM, No. 1:23-cv-00564-NODJ-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO

v. PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

P. HUMPHEY, et al., (ECF No. 43) Defendants. 14 Plaintiff L.C. Cunningham is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 16 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 21, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal of the action 18 with prejudice. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. 19 Civ. P.41(aj)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 20 || dismissed with prejudice and each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case 22 || and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.