Munoz

(PC) Harris v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20231:21-cv-01800California1,829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01800-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO OPT OUT OF POST-

v. SCREENING ADR E. MUNOZ, et al., ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Defendants. PENDING OUTCOME OF CRIMINAL

CASE

16 (Doc. 27)

18 Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On July 31, 2023, Defendants S. Arrequin and E. Munoz filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 19.) On October 9, 2023, Defendant Romero-Valadez filed an answer to the complaint. (Doc. 22.) On October 11, 2023, the Court issued its Order Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR and Staying Case for 90 Days. (Doc. 24.) The action was stayed for 90 days to provide the parties time to settle their dispute before the discovery process begins. (Id. at 1-2.) The parties were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.