Hayes

Hayes v. Kern County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20231:19-cv-01722California9,373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES HAYES, CASE NO. 1:19-CV-01722-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (Doc. 62) KERN COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Pending before the Court is the motion for summary judgment by Defendants Christopher Banks (“Banks”), Rhonda Powell Boyles (“Boyles”), Brandy Hirrel (“Hirrel”), Connie Jefferies (“Jefferies”), Kern County, Jocelyn Wolter (“Wolter”) 1, and Mario Rojas (“Rojas”) (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”), the opposition of Plaintiff Charles Hayes (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants’ reply. (Docs. 62, 65, 76). For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment shall be GRANTED. 23

1 Throughout the parties’ pleadings, Defendant Jocelyn Wolter is referred to as (1) Jocelyn Wolter, (2) Jocelyn Wolters, and (3) Jocelyn Marie. For the Court’s purposes, Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.