Bonta

(PS) Bird v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20232:23-cv-00525California2,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD M. BIRD, No. 2:23-cv-0525 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND ROB BONTA, Attorney General state of FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS California, 15 Defendant, 17 Plaintiff Donald Bird is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), and numerous filings by plaintiff styled as motions. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motions are denied, and the undersigned recommends that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted, and that plaintiff not be granted leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on March 20, 2023, by filing a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” and paying the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.