Ramadan

(PC) Ponce v. Ramadan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20231:23-cv-01193California716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO JESUS PONCE, 1:23-cv-01193-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR A FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS

RAMADAN, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On November 13, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff was afforded 21 days within which to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order, or, alternatively, to file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Id. at 6-7.) On November 21, 2023, the United States Postal Service returned the order to the Court marked “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Refused-SVSP.” That same date, the Clerk of the Court updated Plaintiff’s address to Salinas Valley State Prison in Soledad, California, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.