(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20231:20-cv-00798California832 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRESTON TAYLOR, No. 1:20-cv-00798-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. (ECF No. 122) 14 COMMISSIONER OF THE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

15 CORRECTIONS AND FOR ATTORNEY FEES REHABILITATION, et al., 16 (ECF No. 116) Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 15, 2023, the parties submitted a stipulation consented to United 21 States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 124.) The case was therefore reassigned to 22 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on December 21, 2023, for all purposes. (ECF No. 125.) 23 On October 31, 2023, Findings and Recommendations were issued to grant Plaintiff’s 24 motion for attorney fees, which have not been ruled on by a District Judge. (ECF No. 122.) As 25 noted above, all parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.