Rosemary H. Mullins v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20231:21-cv-00405California2,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSEMARY HINOJOSA MULLINS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00405-NODJ-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER RE INFORMAL DISCOVERY

DISPUTE; MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER;

v. AND VACATING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

AND TRIAL DATES

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., (ECF Nos. 39, 40, 41) Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION On December 20, 2023, the Court held an informal discovery dispute hearing. (ECF Nos. 39, 40, 41.) At the hearing, the Court ordered the parties to file a response indicating how the parties intended to proceed on certain issues concerning this order, on or before the close of business on December 21, 2023. (ECF No. 41.) No filing was made nor did the parties contact the Court. Accordingly, based on the joint letter brief of the parties (ECF No. 40), the arguments presented at the hearing held on December 20, 2023, and the failure of the parties to file a response with the Court despite being ordered to do so, the Court issues the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.