Scalia

(PC) Beckett v. Scalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20231:20-cv-01468California959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW H. BECKETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01468-JLT-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART;

v.

DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

SCALIA, et al., DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING SCREENING

OF PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

Defendants. COMPLAINT

(Doc. 34)

Matthew H. Beckett seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The magistrate judge recommended this action proceed only on the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Scalia, Madrigal and Hernandez, Eighth Amendment failure to protect/failure to intervene claims against Defendant Hackworth, and Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Scalia, Madrigal, Hernandez and Hackworth; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.