Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT RICHARD PRICE, No. 2:23-cv-0731 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN, Defendant. 16 By order filed November 7, 2023, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 9. Thirty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the screening order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the complaint be dismissed for…