Warden

(HC) Pacheco v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20232:23-cv-00765California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN AGUILAR PACHECO, No. 2:23-cv-0765 WBS DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a former1 federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 24, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner, and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 5.) Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 1 Records indicate that petitioner is no longer an inmate in the custody of the Federal Bureau of 25 Prisons. See https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ (inmate locator website operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons). This court may take judicial notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.