Bloomfield

(HC) Hollis v. Bloomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20232:22-cv-01052California537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELLIS CLAY HOLLIS, No. 2:22-CV-1052-WBS-DMC-P Petitioner,

ORDER

v. RONALD BROOMFIELD, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On September 15, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed amended findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. On October 4, 2023, the Magistrate Judge gave petitioner a 30 day extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations, but no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the amended findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. / / / / / / …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.