Henderson v. Nike Headquarters

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20231:23-cv-01556California1,276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUKAS ELIJAH HENDERSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01556-NODJ-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. WITH PREJUDICE NIKE HEADQUARTERS, (Doc. 6) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Lukas Elijah Henderson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil action on November 3, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On November 30, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on December 18, 2023, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 6.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.