(PC) Long v. Kaiser Permanente

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN MICHAEL LONG, No. 2:23-cv-02109 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KAISER PERMANENTE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil action and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1951(a). On September 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the…