(PC) Khademi v. City of Roseville Police Dept.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Davood Khademi, No. 2:23-cv-01735-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. City of Roseville Police Department, 1S Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Davood Khademi 1s incarcerated and is proceeding in this civil rights action without an attorney. He moves to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. The action was 19 referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge under this district’s local rules. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying the motion because Khademi “has had at least 3 actions dismissed for failure to state a claim,” disqualifying him from relief under the in forma pauperis statute. See F&Rs at 1-2, ECF No. (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). Khademi objected to that recommendation. The court has reviewed the record de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Litigants ordinarily qualify to proceed in forma pauperis if they show they cannot pay the 25 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Congress…