(PS) Douglas v. Warner Brothers Films

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20232:23-cv-02320California454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AN JON MARQUIS DOUGLAS, No. 2:23-cv-02320-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARNER BROTHERS FILMS Defendant.

17 Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint for a civil case. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). By order filed on November 6, 2023 (ECF No. 3), the undersigned screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), advised plaintiff of the deficiencies in the complaint, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to file an amended complaint has expired. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or sought an extension of time to do so. For the reasons set forth in the screening order filed on November 6, 2023 (ECF No. 3), the complaint does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.